Throughout his campaign, U.S. President-Elect, Donald Trump, has stated that the cost of a college education concerns him. He suggests that one way to keep higher education affordable is to cap student loan repayments at a maximum of 12.5% of the borrower’s annual income. Those in favor of this idea believe that this approach, along with other proposals being considered by the U.S. Department of Education, may help reverse five years of declining American enrollment. The hope that this plan will also allow college graduates more discretionary income and to save for down payments on major purchases such as cars and homes.
Are International Students’ Fears Legitimate?
Many international students fear that Trump’s victory has granted false legitimacy to white America’s prejudices, and fear of immigrants. Several foreign students attending some of the best colleges in the United States say they would have gone to the U.K. or Canada had they have foreseen the outcome of this election. Needless to say, Mr. Trump’s rhetoric is not helping attract international students in search of a quality education in a safe and welcoming environment.
Trump’s perceived anti-immigration bias has also sparked fears that internships and practical training opportunities may no longer be so readily available to international students; so much so, that some no longer bother to apply for practical training associated with their studies. For this reason, we project that applications for OPT (Optional Practical Training) and H1 working visas will begin on a downward trend unless and until these fears are properly addressed and alleviated.
The Times Higher Education states that “views of the Canada listings page from US academics jumped 17-fold on the day of the election results (9 November) compared with the same day the week before (2 November).” The President of the University of Toronto also noted that his school’s website had 10 times more traffic from computers in the U.S. the day after the election than they did the day before.
One survey conducted before the 2016 presidential election suggests that 60 percent of prospective international were less likely to attend American colleges if Trump were elected President. If this is information is correct and holds true, we visioned two possible scenarios.
Firstly, “agents” in various countries may demand higher commissions from U.S. schools that are heavily dependent upon their “service” for their revenue. This commission, of course, is indirectly paid to the agent by students via the school after they have paid their tuition. This is in addition to the fees students have already paid the agent for “finding” this school for them. In our experience, we have seen these fees range anywhere from USD $1,000.00 to $25,000.00.
These agents could also conceivably “request” U.S. schools adhere to their political considerations. This is not so far-fetched considering America’s current overemphasis on political correctness. For example, at least one private school now no longer displays the American flag. Others have even gone so far as to ban USA-themed celebrations on campus for fear of offending particular groups of people.
Whether you agree or not with these moves, controversial topics demand an open forum where free speech on campus is not stifled by the government, self-serving economic interests, or “politically correct” militant individuals who discriminate against others yet conversely expect to be treated with respect.
Secondly, we expect applications from foreign students to drop significantly. As a result, U.S.schools may lower their standards and/or “covertly” increase acceptance rates to account for the shortfall. This is particularly true for schools whose in-house marketing strategies are not specifically designed to compete in diverse international markets.
If there is anything we have learned from this last administration, it’s that the words hope and change are political code words for more of the same. Once supposedly skeptical of executive power, President Obama has embraced it. It is true that the president has done a lot of during his term. But the same can be said of almost any leader throughout history. In terms of enacting real change, Obama’s administration has been a dismal failure. More of the status quo is not what the majority of Americans had hoped for.
Under the Obama administration, our militarized police forces continue their murderous rampage against minorities (and anyone who dare cross their paths) with virtual impunity. Thanks to current drug laws, asset forfeitures are at an all time high. Policing for profit is now a growth industry, and it allows and encourages law enforcement to seize property from innocent people without charging them with a crime.
America’s War on Drugs (a.k.a. the American people), continues unabated. It’s a glaring failure for all but a select few who, like the Nazis, profit off of human catastrophe. The industrial prison complex and their corporate sponsors, our corrupt legal system, and a poorly trained undereducated police forces are all complicit in this criminal behavior. So, as we hear about other countries invading their neighbors, or atrocities committed against their own people, we should also reflect on our own nation’s crimes against humanity.
The American people are tired of empty promises. The vast majority of Americans are better informed than at any time in our history, and most know what to call cow dung when it’s tossed their way. American want genuine reform. The DNC had their chance to field a real candidate who was ready to take on our dysfunctional corporate-ruled government. But no, the militant feminists controlled DNC had decided long before the primaries began, that it was time for a female to be president. They refused to reason. They saw Senator Bernie Sander’s groundswell of enthusiastic support. But rather than embrace the heartfelt energetic campaign, they felt were threatened by it. They ignored the will of the people, shunned the democratic process, and thereby voided their best chance to take the White House.
Considering the bungled leadership of the last two Presidential administrations, the promise of a Washington outsider in the Oval Office appealed to both sides of the isle. One unconventional candidate was bound to win despite what corporate media had dictated. Although Bernie Sanders supporters may not get all they had hope for in our next administration, they can rest assured that Donald Trump’s presidency will be a radical one.
(Author: T. Gray at Access Education LLC)